Difference between revisions of ":Meteobridge PRO/1/en"
From meteobridge
(Importing a new version from external source) |
(Importing a new version from external source) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ==Available | + | ==Available Now!== |
[[File:meteobridgepro-front2.jpg|320px|right]]With the success of Meteobridge the question how to put this to the next level was obviously on the table. Our answer is to get independent from reflashing third party router platforms and to build a platform that ideally suits the need of a Personal Weather Server. Doing so the design goals were easy to set... | [[File:meteobridgepro-front2.jpg|320px|right]]With the success of Meteobridge the question how to put this to the next level was obviously on the table. Our answer is to get independent from reflashing third party router platforms and to build a platform that ideally suits the need of a Personal Weather Server. Doing so the design goals were easy to set... | ||
* keep low power foot print and find ways to monitor power use | * keep low power foot print and find ways to monitor power use | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* integrate RF features to directly readout data from Davis sensors | * integrate RF features to directly readout data from Davis sensors | ||
* equip with proper RF and WiFi antenna | * equip with proper RF and WiFi antenna | ||
+ | * allow direct GPRS/3G operation with a optional standard USB mobile dongle | ||
* add a database for permanent storage of data | * add a database for permanent storage of data | ||
* allow flexible data exports, where data can be picked up from SMB share or sent via mail of FTP | * allow flexible data exports, where data can be picked up from SMB share or sent via mail of FTP |
Revision as of 11:22, 8 August 2016
Available Now!
With the success of Meteobridge the question how to put this to the next level was obviously on the table. Our answer is to get independent from reflashing third party router platforms and to build a platform that ideally suits the need of a Personal Weather Server. Doing so the design goals were easy to set...- keep low power foot print and find ways to monitor power use
- keep size real tiny
- get rid of necessary USB hubs
- add permanent storage for local data persistence
- integrate RF features to directly readout data from Davis sensors
- equip with proper RF and WiFi antenna
- allow direct GPRS/3G operation with a optional standard USB mobile dongle
- add a database for permanent storage of data
- allow flexible data exports, where data can be picked up from SMB share or sent via mail of FTP
- have some sensors in the box itself (pressure, temp, hum)
- some kind of status and data display would be great
- sensor data graphing features out of the box would be great